Learning how to conduct research in healthcare involves reading, analyzing, and applying relevant studies in real-world settings. Healthcare practitioners have a responsibility to put the well-being of their patients first, which includes taking steps to reduce the likelihood of medication mistakes. According to Makary & Daniel (2020), medication mistakes cause approximately 250 thousand annual deaths in the United States of America. The yearly expenditure of medication errors in the US is estimated to be $4000 million (Makary & Daniel, 2020). Inappropriate prescriptions for patients, including the wrong medication for the wrong patient at the wrong time, are a common cause of medication errors. The purpose of this paper is to provide a thorough description of pharmaceutical errors demonstrate research presentation skills, and address the requirements of BHA FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills.
Identifying Academic Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
By searching for specific terms like “medication errors,” “interventions to reduce medication errors,” and “patient safety interventions” on the Google Scholar platform, an extensive database of scientific publications was obtained. ScienceDirect, PubMed, and the National Center for Institute of Health (NIH) were utilized for access to the research articles. The selected publications from these databases were carefully chosen because of their high quality, relevance, and timeliness in covering the subject of pharmaceutical errors. The search could only be conducted inside peer-reviewed articles, within a certain subject area, and within a certain time frame. Topics covered included medicine; however, data gathering was restricted to the previous five years (Mengist et al., 2019).
Assessing Credibility and Relevance of Information Sources
The CRAAP was used to evaluate the reliability of the articles. The acronym of the CRAAP test is Currency, Relevancy, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It was determined that the articles were published at most five years intervals. Analysis of referenced sources from PubMed, the National Center for Institute of Health (NIH), and ScienceDirect contributed to the identification of academic peer-reviewed papers. An in-depth study of databases was used to ascertain the sources’ relevancy and credibility. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and NIH are all reliable sources since they contain substantial information that contributes to the ongoing discussion of the relevant topic. PubMed’s collection of over 35 million citations and research articles is available without charge, while ScienceDirect’s collection of over 18 million citations requires a paid subscription (PubMed, 2023). Furthermore, NIH databases included data sources whose aims and ends were consistent with the existing literature on drug mistakes. These aspects contribute to the credibility of the various resources that were chosen.
Annotated Bibliography
Afaya, A., Konlan, K. D., & Kim Do, H. (2021). Improving patient safety through identifying barriers to reporting medication administration errors among nurses: An integrative review. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07187-5
BHA FPX 4000 Assessment 2
This study conducted a systematic review to identify and analyze the obstacles that prevent nurse practitioners from reporting medication delivery errors within the hospital environment. Researchers have observed that nurses do not record all instances of medication delivery errors. The factors contributing to the underreporting of such errors encompass apprehension regarding personal accountability for patient health deterioration, concerns about potential bad sentiments from patients or their families towards the nurse, apprehension about legal accountability, and the implementation of restrictive measures by hospital administration. Scholars have emphasized the significance of implementing a non-punitive harmful event reporting system in order to mitigate the prevalence of underreporting prescription errors. Additionally, the research findings also suggest the importance of establishing a consensus among policymakers, management, and nurses regarding a standardized definition of medication error. This understanding is crucial in order to improve nurses’ capacity to record instances of drug delivery errors accurately. The article used was written by credible authors and was relevant to our healthcare issue.
BHA FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills
Brabcová, I., Hajduchová, H., Tóthová, V., Chloubová, I., Červený, M., Prokešová, R., Malý, J., Vlček, J., Doseděl, M., Malá-Ládová, K., Tesař, O., & O’Hara, S. (2023). Reasons for medication administration errors, barriers to reporting them and the number of reported medication administration errors from the perspective of nurses: A cross-sectional survey. Nurse Education in Practice, 70(31), 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103642
“BHA FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills: The objective of this study was to ascertain the underlying causes of medicine administration errors, delineate the obstacles hindering their documentation, and approximate the number of reported instances of medication administration errors. A sociological study was conducted utilizing the standardized Medication Administration Error Survey. One of the primary factors contributing to medication administration errors is the similarity in the names and packaging of different prescriptions. Additionally, the substitution of brand drugs with more affordable generic alternatives, frequently occurring delays during the preparation and use of medications, and illegible health records are also commonly identified as causes of such errors. Related blog BUS FPX 3007 Assessment 3: Building Effective Teams
The researchers have additionally proposed preventive and remedial interventions that can be used. Various interventions can be implemented to mitigate drug delivery errors. These include the implementation of electronic prescriptions for medication ( E-prescribing), using Barcode Medication Administration (BCMA), the active participation of clinical pharmacists in the pharmacological process, and the provision of regular and thorough education for nurses. The article provided an in-depth analysis of medication errors and prevention strategies, making it relevant to our study.
Applying Research Skills
Hong, K., Hong, Y. D., & Cooke, C. E. (2019). Medication errors in community pharmacies: The need for commitment, transparency, and research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(7), 823–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.11.014
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the existing prevalence of medication errors within hospital settings, as well as a review of medication safety studies conducted in community-based pharmacy settings in the United States. The article emphasizes the urgent requirement for further research in this domain. The techniques employed by community pharmacy organizations to mitigate prescription errors are also disseminated. Given the contextual information provided, the researchers proceed with a discussion of the advantages that would arise from the public dissemination of strategies for managing prescription mistakes. Furthermore, researchers advocate for a culture of transparency within community pharmacies, particularly in regard to the identification, control, and prevention of medication mistakes. The findings indicate that instances of medication errors are prevalent in both hospitals as well as community pharmacies, with certain cases resulting in significant health consequences. Moreover, there is evidence to imply an increasing trend in the estimated number of medication errors. This article was selected for the study because of its relevance to our topic. Get complete BHA FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills.
BHA FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills
Manias, E., Kusljic, S., & Wu, A. (2020). Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical settings: A systematic review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 11(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098620968309
The purpose of this article is to show how following established protocols and recommendations can help improve patient safety while dealing with the administration of drugs. According to the researchers, pharmaceutical mistakes are an alternative for measuring the poor quality of medical care. Safe practices for medication administration are also discussed in the article, including the importance of double-checking that the right medication is given to the right patient at the right time via the right route. In addition, the authors show that healthcare providers recognize the importance of supplementary protocols such as complete records or documentation, patients’ rights to refuse medication, adequate assessment, accurate evaluation, and thorough training. The researchers also detailed the best practices, which included making a strategy, removing any distractions, and following the guidelines for giving medications exactly as prescribed. The paper is relevant because it provides best practices for administering medications and stresses the need for collaboration between nurses and managers to implement safety measures supported by research.
Learnings from the Research
The use of an annotated bibliography pertaining to medication errors has facilitated the researchers’ access to contemporary studies that address noteworthy medical concerns. The literature presents a comprehensive analysis of the main findings, which primarily revolve around the underlying factors contributing to pharmaceutical errors. These factors encompass nurse neglect, inadequate communication, and failure to adhere to established best practices. Moreover, the paper’s interventions such as the adoption of E-prescribing or BCMA, a non-punitive harmful event reporting system, the establishment of training initiatives to enhance medication management, and the fostering of cooperation among interdisciplinary team members. The research highlights the importance of addressing pharmaceutical errors to uphold patient safety, along with identifying effective techniques for securely and efficiently administering medications.
Conclusion
In conclusion, medication mistakes may be regarded as an indication of inadequate healthcare quality. Moreover, medication errors have been found to be associated with a range of individual and organizational factors. Instances of substandard communication and negligence in nursing practice might give rise to adverse nursing events. The process of annotating sources had a vital role in enhancing the research skills of nurses.
References
Afaya, A., Konlan, K. D., & Kim Do, H. (2021). Improving patient safety through identifying barriers to reporting medication administration errors among nurses: An integrative review. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07187-5
Brabcová, I., Hajduchová, H., Tóthová, V., Chloubová, I., Červený, M., Prokešová, R., Malý, J., Vlček, J., Doseděl, M., Malá-Ládová, K., Tesař, O., & O’Hara, S. (2023). Reasons for medication administration errors, barriers to reporting them and the number of reported medication administration errors from the perspective of nurses: A cross-sectional survey. Nurse Education in Practice, 70(31), 103-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103642
Hong, K., Hong, Y. D., & Cooke, C. E. (2019). Medication errors in community pharmacies: The need for commitment, transparency, and research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(7), 823–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.11.014
Manias, E., Kusljic, S., & Wu, A. (2020). Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical settings: A systematic review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 11(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098620968309
Makary, M. A., & Daniel, M. (2020). Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ, 353(21), 09-19. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2139
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2019). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for science research. MethodsX, (13)7, 100-777. Sciencedirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
