Applying Ethical Principles
Health professionals must deal each day. When they must confront scenarios that aren’t straightforward and simple, they need to take a moral choice that may be a challenge to their convictions. If they’re faced by such situations, they have to consider ethical principles and moral values when making decisions. Self-determination, beneficence and justice, along with in the absence of malice, are the main ethical principles in healthcare that must be considered when making decisions. Recognizing being aware of and accepting that there’s a problem, and being aware of the limitations could help guide the ethical choices.
In accordance with the American College of Healthcare Executives The responsibility lies with healthcare executives to lead in a manner that sets the bar for ethical conduct and guide the moral conduct for their businesses.
Overview of Case Study
E.L. Straight who was recently appointed director of clinical services for medical services at Hopewell Hospital is in the phase of making enhancements for increasing the standard of the care offered at Hopewell Hospital. Straight is in charge for daily operations and has been working on creative programs to increase the quality of care that patients receive. The doctor. Cutrite was one of the surgeons who worked at Hopewell Hospital for prolonged periods was widely believed to be an excellent surgeon and powerful politician. In the past we have observed that doctor. Cutrite has begun to be depressed mentally and physical. Due to the changes in his health, Straight is thinking about having his rights reduced but due to his relationships and the length of his work, it isn’t a simple task to carry out. There’s a high possibility that the doctor. Cutrite is among the physicians at Hopewell who have suffered from low patient satisfaction due to errors. Changes are taking places for Dr.
The rights of Dr. Cutrite continue to allow him to go through several surgeries (Capella University in 2020). When the Dr. Cutrite performed a procedure for Mrs. Jameson’s abdomen, she was spotted by a nurse from a medical facility that was helping in the reconciliation of surgical materials with was a cap for the surgery was missing and thought to be in the surgical wound. The surgeon’s nurse became aware and informed Straight who informed her that it could be because the cap used in surgical procedure had been kept in Mrs.
Jameson explained that in the event that the cap was within of the wound will be difficult to find. Straight suggests having the patient go back to the surgery regardless of the fact that it’s revealed that the patient has been removed from the surgery. The person who did surgery also notified physician. Cutrite about the issue, however Cutrite was not informed of the situation. Cutrite was insistent the conclusion that nothing needed to do and there was no need to notify that patient. Dr. Cutrite believes that the patient. Jameson could feel a little discomfort, but she’d no idea that it was there. After he discovers this, Straight decides to reach for the surgeon in charge of surgery. Straight then proposes a hypothetical scenario for him to inquire about the possible outcome should a surgical cap be placed in the hands of one patient. The chief of surgery knew there was something amiss and didn’t create a issue about it. In fact, he did exactly as the doctor. Cutrite. That’s why Straight knew that his time in the hospital. But due to the doctor. Cutrite’s authority and position and position, the hospital was obliged to adopt a more cautious approach. Straight faces the moral decision of not addressing the issue, or according to the proper way and pursue discipline against the doctor. Cutrite all while ensuring that the patient is aware (Capella University of 2020)
Find Ethical Issues in the Case Study
The cap left by the surgeon’s abdomen by Mrs. Jameson and the refusal to inform surgeon Dr. Cutrite and the chief of staff created an ethical dilemma that Straight faces. Straight acknowledges there is potential risk for the patient when there is no chance of harm due to the cap which remains in the abdomen of her. But, the surgeon Dr. Cutrite is continuing to make mistakes during surgery along with Chief of Staff’s indifference and lack of concern for this issue. Straight would like to solve this issue, however neither doctors. Cutrite or the chief of staff for surgical care want to take action. Both believe that there’s very low risk of injury for Jameson’s patient. Jameson. Straight is worried about the possibility that Dr. Cutrite’s condition continues to decline and he makes errors during surgery. Straight is refusing to take any responsibility. Because of Dr. Cutrite being politically powerful in Hopewell and also in his present position, it’s extremely difficult for Straight to limit his right to minimize the risk for exposure due to surgical mistakes.
Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 1 to Analyze the Case Study
The concept of ethical choice-making comprises three parts such as moral awareness as well as moral judgment and behavior that aid Straight in making an ethical decision for the particular situation. If faced by the need to make a moral decision, these three components can be used. Straight makes the use of moral consciousness when he realizes that there are issues that need to be addressed, and applying the moral judgement when making the decision as to whether it is right or not which results in moral conduct. The Straight model is a good one in order to assist for the use of critically thinking in the face of ethical dilemmas.
In this specific instance, Straight employs the element of moral conscience by recognizing that the problem was caused by surgical error as well as the lack of action made by Dr. Cutrite and the chief of staff in addressing the issue. Straight’s moral decision-making is utilized in the context of trying to conduct himself ethically by asking doctor. Cutrite or the chief of staff alert the Dr. Cutrite or Mrs. Jameson about the mistake in the surgery. Thinking critically and using his moral judgment and awareness Straight’s moral conduct is the consequence of the actions he takes in order to resolve the ethical dilemma. Straight realizes that he’s not part of the medical team but as a health administrator Straight is responsible for overseeing that patients get the best well.
Get high-quality healthcare. The doctor “must address a conflict or uncertainty regarding competing values, such as personal, organizational, professional and societal values” ( Ethics-based decision-making for managers in the healthcare field,” 2016.). Health professionals of all kinds in all their tasks, is accountable for complying with the four rules of ethical conduct in health autonomy, self-determination and integrity and justice. By following these guidelines, you can Straight to make an ethical decision.
Effectiveness of Communication Approaches in the Case Study
Effective communication is taking note of what’s communicated to make sure that the message is understood. In this particular instance, Straight ought to have be clear and aggressive when speaking to doctor. Cutrite and the chief surgeon. If they were to approach the matter in the same way, it will have allowed people to be aware of the seriousness of what has occurred and make sure that the patient’s security is a top priority when making a decision. Straight recognizes that the doctors’ connections are part of the Dr. Cutrite has therefore being clear to resolve this issue.
The surgeon’s supervisor in the operating area took an unflinching approach at the time he approached Straight to tell her about the error that was made that was made by Dr. Cutrite, she was honest and did not change her behavior in the light of the position he held or his the influence of. He was provided with an opportunity to correct the mistake and put the safety of patients over her own security However, when it was not an option Straight took the issue into the hands of Straight. The information was presented in a clear and concise manner that let Straight to evaluate the circumstances and make an educated decision. Straight was aware of the Dr. Cutrite’s role and power he held within the hospital. She and contacted the chief surgeon and informally brought the concern to the head of surgery’s attention, in the shape of a hypothetical inquiry. In such a way it was not productive for Straight as the head of staff did not know all the facts and was only able to discern there was something wrong. Due to the lack of concern for the situation, his conclusion is that Dr. Cutrite personally. The inability to communicate could hinder an ethically sound decision.
However, Straight attempts to correct the problem it became apparent of his inability to discuss the problem by refusing to have a private discussion between doctor. Cutrite and the chief surgeon. Straight is supposed to be a surgeon because Straight is a person who has had the privilege of having the ability to be able to ignore ethical concerns due to the fact that Straight “refrained from fingernail biting for years, but that old habit was suddenly overwhelming” (Capella University, 2020) Straight realized that the sole person he would like to speak with was doctor. Cutrite. Healthcare professionals have the responsibility to address ethical concerns and when they follow the four ethical principles within the field of health, they’ll have the ability to make an informed conclusion.
Capella NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 1 Case Study
In the case study, according to the facts from the research study, Straight wasn’t a participant in the four fundamental concepts, which began with the independence. Patient Mrs. Jameson was never notified and never had the possibility to choose. This decision was made without the knowledge from the surgeon. Cutrite and the director of the surgical team were not consulted in their statement that she was able to feel discomfort, but it was not threatening to her own life. The notions of justice, beneficence and nefariousness were not demonstrated in this research. In the event that there was a choice to undergo the surgery inside the patient Mrs. Jameson without consulting her or her family She was not consulted about what would be best for her best interests and thus she was treated in a way that was unjust.
In the event that you need to resolve the issue of ethicality, Straight must take a aggressive, clear method and address any concerns you have about a moral decision is possible. The issues surrounding patients of Dr. Cutrite have to be addressed, along with the hospital chief’s lack of ability to address the issue and ensuring timely notice for Jameson’s wife. Jameson are all steps that Straight must take as quickly as it is feasible. Straight must speak to both doctor. Cutrite and the chief of staff. Staff members should be made aware of the possibility of the possibility of an investigation regarding their disregard for patients. It is assumed that there is an ethics committee. Hopewell is part of an ethics committee. Straight must notify Doctor. Cutrite that he will be informed by them and to the medical examiners board for his actions and authority can be terminated depending on the findings. The steps taken follow the decisions Straight did to restrain his powers.
Conclusion
In this case study Straight should realize that the most efficient approach for the issue is to respond quickly. The key is to keep in mind when confronted by an ethical dilemma this approach should use continuously. Straight needs to determine which method is most beneficial in the good interests for all involved. Using the ethical decision-making model that incorporates the principles of ethics for health care is the most efficient method for this issue.
References
Capella University. (2020). Ethical Case Studies. Retrieved from
https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/nhs4000element18655/wrapper.asp
Ethics-based making for medical healthcare professionals. (2016 on November 14, 2016). American College of Healthcare Executives. Retrieved from
Novosel, L. M. (2020). Spring 2020: A Crash Course in Ethics. Urologic Nursing, 40(3), 109. Retrieved from https://doi-org.library.capella.edu/10.7257/1053-816x.2020.40.3.109
