NURS FPX 1150 Assessment 3 Lessons From History Presentation

You are currently viewing NURS FPX 1150 Assessment 3 Lessons From History Presentation

Lessons from History

NURS FPX 1150 Assessment 3 Lessons From History Presentation

Hello everyone, my name is Maya, and today I am going to present my topic related to the lessons from history. I selected my topic that is “Women’s Abortion Rights.” I will explain in this presentation the overview of the topic where I will explain its history. Then I will discuss the credibility of the four sources I selected for this presentation. Moreover, the causes of the long-term impact of historical events and the use of critical thinking to relate past challenges and strategies to the current organizational issues are discussed in detail. 

Overview Of a Chosen Issue

Abortion dominates American politics. All opinions are represented in news, social media, print, radio, and TV (Haddad & Nour, 2019). In the previous year, reproductive rights attack increased. This year, six states have passed “heartbeat” legislation prohibiting abortions between weeks 6 and 8. In Alabama, the first state to ban abortions, rape and incest are also illegal. These bans haven’t taken effect because they’re in court. In this heated debate, more abortion-seeking women should be heard. One in four women will have an abortion, yet the stigma prevents them from speaking out.

As a reproductive health specialist, I hear similar stories. Modern reproductive medicine routinely performs abortions. According to a poll, one in four American women will have an abortion before 45. The Guttmacher Center in New York City has maintained this data for 50 years. Due to the political climate and economic downturn, some women may seek fewer abortions. Inquire again why women seek abortions. In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Mississippi, abortion legislation was challenged (Haddad & Nour, 2019).

This rule is in direct contrast to the Supreme Court’s Roe ruling, which says states may not limit abortions before fetal viability, which occurs between 22 and 24 weeks of pregnancy. Jackson Women’s Health Organization won their appeal before the Supreme Court. The court’s conservatives voted 6-3 to uphold Mississippi’s ban. After the Supreme Court’s ruling, the states must decide. In recent months, states have recklessly approved additional abortion restrictions, preparing for a new frontier. Many communities are implementing similar restrictions.

Credibility of Sources

The credibility of Source 1

This article reveals how reminding women of their legal abortion rights might help lessen the emotional anguish that often accompanies an abortion. This is the essential takeaway from reading this paper (Kimport et al., 2011).

The credibility of Source 2

The most important lesson from reading this article is the need to raise knowledge about abortion rights and restrictions to ensure that women have access to legal and safe treatments (Oduro & Otsin, 2014).

NURS FPX 1150 Assessment 3 Lessons From History Presentation

The credibility of Source 3

The most significant thing to take up from this is that the stigma associated with abortion has a clear financial and medical effect on women who seek care for abortions. This is the most important takeaway (Moore et al., 2021).

The credibility of Source 4

This publication is reliable since the information is presented objectively, the authors are associated with an esteemed organization, and the materials utilized are properly cited. The essential thing to know is that having a pre-existing sickness or several illnesses may raise or lessen the probability of suffering unfavorable consequences on one’s mental health if one decides to have an abortion (Major et al., 2009).

Causes and Long-Term Impacts of a Historical Event

In the United States, the fight for women’s access to abortion has lasted a very long. Abortion-related guilt is pervasive around the globe, and it may be used to discredit persons who have had an abortion. To comprehend how abortion is seen around the globe despite its widespread stigmatization, one must consider its unique dynamics in the context of a specific area. Social processes at all levels of the socioecological hierarchy are accountable for implementing and maintaining the stigma associated with abortion by exposing and absorbing individuals (Moore et al., 2021). Because of abortion, persons who seek abortion care services, those who provide abortion care, and anybody engaged in abortion coverage and access may be stigmatized. 

Get Help With Your Assignment

If you need assistance with writing your coursework, Our Professional Help is here for you!

The laws and policies of a country may be greatly influenced by the prevailing social norms of that society. Due to the widespread unfavourable public opinion of abortion, politicians may be convinced to implement restrictive abortion legislation, which will help reinforce and perpetuate the poor public perception of abortion in the nation’s political system. Power over a person’s sexual or reproductive choices and access to abortion may result from a number of factors, such as the criminalization of abortion, legislative restrictions on abortion, and a government’s unwillingness to spend money on offering free services to the poor.

Past Challenges, Strategies and Current Organizational Issues

Nearly every country had prohibited abortion by the close of the 19th century. In each of their various nations, the British, French, Portuguese, Spanish, and Italian imperial powers-imposed limitations on abortion (Berer, 2017). These nations have enacted the vast bulk of this kind of law. On the abortion legislation website of the United Nations Population Division, prohibitive legal regimes are categorized into three distinct groups. These legal systems evolved throughout the sixteenth century and the ensuing colonization era. They are now still developing. Restrictive abortion laws are only rational as a punishment and deterrent or as a means of protecting the unborn from their mother. Abortions outside the legal system that do not result in injury or death are far more prevalent than those that do, even though there are still convictions for unsafe abortions (Berer, 2017). 

Due to archaic abortion laws, women who cannot afford a safe illegal abortion are responsible for their own lives and injuries. These regulations are decades old. In October 1920, the Soviet Union’s abortion laws were liberalized for the first time (Lukashevich, 2021). Alexandra Kollanti provided a new orientation. Since then, progressive abortion legislation has been justified based on public health and human rights to encourage smaller families for demographic and environmental reasons (Valeras, 2019). Women’s education and higher socioeconomic status have made alternatives to motherhood available. There has been a shift in progressive abortion policy since then. These statistics justify a change in legislation that favors abortion-seeking women (Valeras, 2019). 

NURS FPX 1150 Assessment 3 Lessons From History Presentation

Controlling one’s reproductive cycle is already general knowledge in almost all cultures. Contraception has been decriminalized, but abortion has not. This remains true despite a century of safe abortion initiatives. From the first to the sixth story, the frequency of deaths falls. In nations where women have unlimited access to abortions, abortions are seldom lethal. According to recent research, increasing contraceptive usage and offering post-abortion care is insufficient to achieve this goal. This includes the failure of users and non-users to utilize contraceptives, which are common sexual behaviour. Users have a greater risk of contraceptive failure. Despite several demands for decriminalization of abortion, no human rights organization has ever advocated for it to be legal if a woman wishes (Erdman & Cook, 2019). The topic of how diverse organizations and people perceive “decriminalization” is raised in this context. Under current U.S. legislation, abortion is a criminal offence. These laws are usually found in criminal or penal codes. Offences Against Person Act of 1861 criminalized abortion in the Great Britain (Chisholm, 2021).

The Infant Life Preservation Act of 1929 made abortion acceptable in the US. The Abortion Act of 1967, as revised by the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act of 1990, legalized abortion in the United Kingdom (though not in Northern Ireland). Except for Northern Ireland, abortion is lawful in the United Kingdom. Despite the 1967 Abortion Act specifying permissible abortion grounds, the Abortion Act of 1861 is still used to prosecute women who have illegal abortions (Moirangthem, 2020). Since these statistics were released in 2002, there has been little change. WHO’s Human Reproductive Program will prepare end-of-year updates to the UN Population Division’s website on abortion law worldwide, which will contain new information on abortion policy (Moirangthem, 2020).

Get Your Paper Ready in No Time!!

Our Professional Ph.D. Writers are here for you!


Berer, M. (2017). Abortion law and policy around the world: in search of decriminalization. Health and Human Rights, 19(1), 13–27.

Chisholm, N. (2021). English law of the offences against the person act 1861: outline and case summaries. SSRN Electronic Journal. 

Erdman, J. N., & Cook, R. J. (2019). Decriminalization of abortion – A human rights imperative. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 

Haddad, L. B., & Nour, N. M. (2019). Unsafe abortion: unnecessary maternal mortality. Reviews in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2(2), 122–126. 

Kimport, K., Foster, K., & Weitz, T. A. (2011). Social sources of women’s emotional difficulty after abortion: lessons from women’s abortion narratives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43(2), 103–109. 

Lukashevich, A. M. (2021). How the border myths were born: air incidents at the soviet-german border (october 1939 – june 1941). Voprosy Vseobshchei Istorii, 24, 268–280. 

NURS FPX 1150 Assessment 3 Lessons From History Presentation

Major, B., Appelbaum, M., Beckman, L., Mary Ann Dutton, Nancy Felipe Russo, & West, C. (2009). Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence. American Psychologist, 64(9), 863–890. 

Moirangthem, A. (2020). A Study to assess the level of expressed satisfaction related to abortion associated services among women who have undergone abortion. International Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research, 07(02), 3–10. 

Moore, B., Poss, C., Coast, E., Lattof, S. R., & van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (2021). The economics of abortion and its links with stigma: A secondary analysis from a scoping review on the economics of abortion. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0246238. 

Oduro, G. Y., & Otsin, M. N. A. (2014). “Abortion—it is my own body”: women’s narratives about influences on their abortion decisions in ghana. Health Care for Women International, 35(7-9), 918–936. Valeras, A. S. (2019). Caring is complex: and it always has been. Families, Systems, & Health, 37(1), 98–100.