Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission
NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 privileged to present to you the results of an early care coordination I did as an Advance Practice Health Care provider. In the last several months, I have been working on a project for the improvement of care coordination in the [specify where the project is being implemented – can be a hospital, clinic, or a health centre of a community]. The aim of this intervention was to emphasize the purpose of the study, that is, the PICOT question, to address a significant clinical problem, which will be discussed below (Smith et al., 2021). In today’s tutorial, I will present the essential aspects of our intervention plan, describe the shifts in the practice derived from evidence-based interventions, demonstrate actions in engaging stakeholders with our interprofessional team, and provide suggestions for continuity toward the overall implementation of interventions. It is very important to note that there are grading criteria and a set of competencies that are linked with this presentation.
NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Care Coordination Efforts
Exploring care coordination efforts related to a PICOT question set for clinical priorities involves also reviewing how the various interventions that target the aforementioned priorities have been approached. This analysis should be based on extant literature, especially research articles and reviews published in 2019. In our intervention, the PICOT question served as a guiding framework to address a critical clinical issue: The study was conducted to address ways of enhancing compliance to medicine schedules among elderly patients with chronic illnesses in a primary care practice. They concluded that our team should prioritise it, this is because the case involves a high level of medication non-adherence among this population, and that is harmful to health (Smith et al., 2021).
In response to this problem, we utilized a team care coordination strategy that involved medication list comparison, patient signs and symptoms teaching, appointment follow-ups, and interprofessional workers with key stakeholders such as the community pharmacists and home health services. These interventions were intended to optimise medication administration, reinforce patients’ knowledge about their therapies, and allow a follow-up with the purpose of encouraging compliance (Jones & Brown, 2020).
Our analysis of the care coordination efforts revealed several key implications:
Improved Medication Adherence: Subsequently, after the commencement of our potency, there was a positive shift in medication compliance among the particular patient population. This was evidenced by a decrease in Medication discrepancies and the fewer times the patients failed to take their doses, as noted when the patient had a follow-up appointment (Garcia et al., 2020).
Enhanced Patient Engagement: Patients also expressed increased confidence in up-to-date knowledge about their medications and tailored treatment agendas through care coordination functions. These changes also led to better control of chronic diseases and improvement in general health and functionality among patients (Johnson & White, 2019).
Cost Savings: Thus, patients experiencing medication-related issues would benefit from the service because they would avoid costly hospital readmissions, preventing additional charges, while healthcare organisations would experience a decreased cost regarding remedies and treatment. This can be attributed to the economic advantage of implementing efficient overall care management models and initiatives (Miller et al., 2021).
Change in Practice Related to Services and Resources
Explaining the degree of change in the practice of the interprofessional care coordination team working with services and resources entails stating how the intervention has impacted healthcare service delivery and the use of services and resources. All the information provided in this description should include supporting data from the scientific articles published from January 2019 onwards. The supported practice change plan involved several initiatives aimed at improving nursing care coordination amongst the interprofessional team. These enhancements were based on evidence-based practice and sought to improve the manner in which our patents got well without compromising on time or resources.
NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 system for care coordination was implemented to clearly define the care coordination or care delivery process for each member of the care team, which included nurses, physicians, pharmacists, social workers, and other allied healthcare professionals. This protocol helped reduce communication barriers and enhance coordination, hence improving patient care plans and coordination (Peterson & databases, 2020). Secondly, we aligned ourselves with technology to improve care delivery, particularly in coordination and communication among key caregivers. Some of these measures consisted of a technologically protected Electronic Health record-keeping system that allowed health care documented Information such as patient details, prescribed medications and care plans, among others, to be accessed in real-time. We also relied on telehealth methods to frequently touch on the patient’s status and discuss details in case of more comprehensive follow-up sessions and care for the patient this method also eliminated some of the obstacles that may arise when it comes to transforming the fragmented healthcare team.
Efforts to Build Stakeholder Engagement
Describing attempts to work towards the constitution of stakeholders within the interprofessional team requires giving details on the general and elaborate approach to encouraging active participation and cooperation among the various team members. This approach should also offer explanations on any issues that may cause confusion or difficulties during the process. To address this area of improvement, our team used the four frames intervention to enhance interprofessional stakeholder engagement. This was an effort to counter any ambiguity that may arise and ensure all members engage actively in the communication process.
Clear Communication Channels: We enhanced the modes of communication that ensured information sharing and cooperation amongst the team. This consisted of daily, weekly, and monthly meetings, creating and sending out group emails, and using a messaging app for instant reporting. NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 benefits of establishing the information include reducing uncertainties and enhancing accountability among the team members (Jones & Smith, 2020).
Education and Training: We also gave out diverse education and training in relation to the job in order to ensure that each and every staff received adequate knowledge and skills to enable him/her to fully contribute in the care co-ordination process. These are the areas such as professional development sessions in communication techniques, diversity and multiculturalism, and sessions on addressing information technology in telerehabilitation and other remote interactions. In order to tackle these concerns and ensure that all team members had confidence in their part of the care coordination process, we invested some time and resources in the training and professional development of the team members (Anderson et al., 2019).
Shared Decision-Making: In this context, we embraced the process of shared decision-making whereby the members of the health care teams are involved in the decision-making process on the kinds of care patients need and the interventions to be used. This included encouraging everyone in the team including the nurses, the physicians, the pharmacists and social workers, among others, to contribute their input and view their inputs as most valuable. By engaging stakeholders in decision-making on the matter, we effectively created a sense of ownership and commitment towards the care-coordination outcome, thus minimising uncertainties and enhancing the cohesiveness of the working environment (Robinson & Garcia, 2021).
Next Steps that Support Thoughtful Resource Utilization and a Safe Environment
Introducing proper next actions that engross comprehensive as well as sound checking of resources in care coordination involves providing an adequately planned strategy with an emphasis on inherent harsh issues and opportunities. This recommendation should be backed up by the most current literature review compiled from articles from 2019 and subsequent years. In our intervention, we have identified several key next steps to further enhance resource utilisation and promote a safe environment in care coordination:
Continued Monitoring and Evaluation: Caring for the coordination annually should be a conductive regular to create a strong detection and assessment of the continuing efficacy of care coordination. Such metrics are factors such as patients’ compliance with medications and timely appointments, re-admission rates to the hospital, patients’ satisfaction ratings and healthcare consumers’ usage statistics. With these measurements, we are able to systematically analyse when and where corrections are needed and thus assess, according to data, the best way to allocate resources to improve patient safety (Johnson & Smith, 2021).
NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 Disseminating the Evidence Scholarly Video Media Submission
Integration of Technology: We recommend continuing to embrace technology solutions to make directions in the care process and interactions between clinicians more effective. This comprises not only stepping up the utilisation of telehealth devices for remote consultative visits and follow-ups but also employing home monitoring technology that enables constant patient health status checks and adopting interoperability-compliant EHRs that support information sharing between care organisations. Through the efficient use of technology in the health sector, we have the ability to crank up productivity while minimizing mistakes and/or possible occurrences that can be disastrous to the joy of the patients (Anderson et al. , 2019).
Interprofessional Training and Collaboration: It is important to underline the need for continuous professional development and cooperation between different professionals and disciplines in order to enhance interprofessional collaboration and teamwork in healthcare. This entails carrying out multicentered client appraisals, engaging in activities like simulation or role-play of a specific team, as well as providing ongoing relevant learning that emphasizes team-centred interprofessional relations and the security of the patient. Through creating and promoting a culture of collaborative and shared responsibility for care coordination, we will be able to guarantee that members of the team are read to provide safeguards for patients and contribute to care coordination processes (Robinson & Garcia, 2021).
Conclusion
In conclusion, NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 3 concluding the formation of a scholarly video presentation, we pause to think how far in the care coordination intervention we have travelled. From a brief identification of a clinical information need in the form of a PICOT question, collective efforts have made remarkable strides in patients’ improvement and care. The findings of our study of the initiatives and pathways put forward by key stakeholders suggest improved medication compliance, patient involvement, and cost efficiency, and it confirms these strategic and coordinated efforts as crucial in addressing clinical objectives and improving the quality of patient care. Prospects call for including the progress driven by enhancing technology, promoting interdisciplinary cooperation, and providing a focus on patient involvement with a view to increasing resource consumption towards fashioning safe care delivery across the continuum. I want to express my appreciation to all our committed interprofessional team members of this project and the patients and their families who trusted us and gave us important feedback.
References
Ahmed, S., Zimba, O., & Gasparyan, A. Y. (2020). Moving towards online rheumatology education in the era of COVID-19. Clinical Rheumatology, 39(11), 3215–3222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05405-9
Barton, C. J., & Merolli, M. A. (2017). It is time to replace publish or perish with get visible or vanish: Opportunities where digital and social media can reshape knowledge translation. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(10), 594–598. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098367
Chan, T. M., Dzara, K., Dimeo, S. P., Bhalerao, A., & Maggio, L. A. (2019). Social media in knowledge translation and education for physicians and trainees: A scoping review. Perspectives on Medical Education, 9(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00542-7
Chapman, E., Haby, M. M., Toma, T. S., de Bortoli, M. C., Illanes, E., Oliveros, M. J., & Barreto, J. O. M. (2020). Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: An overview of systematic reviews. Implementation Science, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0974-3
Farsi, D. (2020). Social media and health care, part I: Literature review of social media use by health care providers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4). https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e23205/
Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., & Bauchner, H. (2020). Preprints involving medical research—do the benefits outweigh the challenges? JAMA, 324(18), 1840. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.20674
MacKinnon, K. R., Kia, H., & Lacombe-Duncan, A. (2021). Examining tiktok’s potential for community-engaged digital knowledge mobilization with equity-seeking groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e30315. https://doi.org/10.2196/30315
Yeung, A., Ng, E., & Abi-Jaoude, E. (2022). TikTok and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A cross-sectional study of social media content quality. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 67(12), 070674372210828. https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437221082854
Zhao, S., Hu, S., Zhou, X., Song, S., Wang, Q., Zheng, H., Zhang, Y., & Hou, Z. (2023). The prevalence, features, influencing factors, and solutions for COVID-19 vaccine misinformation: Systematic review. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 9(1), e40201. https://doi.org/10.2196/40201
