NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 Community Resources and Best Practices

You are currently viewing NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 Community Resources and Best Practices

NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 technologies come with several threats, making it essential to keep system data secure. Electronic health records (EHR) are widely used in health systems across various countries, containing vital patient information. However, security breaches and ethical concerns have been raised (Ceriello et al., 2022). The primary objective of this presentation is to discuss ethical issues related to electronic health information and propose solutions.

NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 Community Resources and Best Practices

Effective coordination in care provision is integral to quality care and patient outcomes. The challenges that the health care organizations are bound to pose most of the time could be better managed or administered quality care since the arenas are permanently restricted settings or environments (Lowery et al. 2019). The presentation’s General Objective is to research how community resources can improve collaborative care. This presentation is intended to empower healthcare leaders, highlighting their crucial role in improving care coordination through ethical and legal review, evidence-based interventions, the importance of data-driven collaborative working, and improved care in coordination. It is crucial to remember that the stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and leaders, play a vital role in this intervention, making them feel empowered and involved.

Scenario

A 45-year-old patient, Stella, with diabetes, missed her hospital appointment due to technical disturbances and later discovered that her data was deleted from the hospital system due to a security breach. NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1ethical assumption, the basis of informatics for care coordination, is a category that has significant impacts. Artificial technology and medicine take precedence, and the possible ethical difficulties must be addressed. Else, the essential ethical question is the protection of the patient and privacy. Health systems store unreliable information, including patient data like medical history, diagnoses, and treatment records. Appears to pose the possibility of privacy, and as a result of its decrease, it can make the information untrustable and unbelievable.

Ethical Issues About Using Healthcare Information Systems

EHR is a valuable healthcare system that stores detailed patient data, reducing paperwork and aiding healthcare practitioners (Marmor et al., 2018). Ethical issues include data disclosure without patient consent, privacy concerns, informed consent, data security, and equitable access (Solimini et al., 2019). EHR improves chronic disease management and reduces medication errors (Ventresca et al., 2020).

Another aspect of healthcare data systems is that ethical issues should necessarily point to data reliability and safety, and protecting patient information from being a victim of cyber threats and data breaches is necessary. Thus, unique solutions need to be created. As a prerequisite, healthcare institutions must install severe security systems and precautions that make this sensitive data accessible only to authorized personnel and guarantee its authenticity. In the ethical sphere, another factor concerns who will be given access, which will be allocated impartially. Healthcare information systems should address this gap and be designed to avoid creating new dimensions in access or service use inequity. It is critical to close the gaps in digital help and enlighten the less penurious persons or those out of the town of the neat healthcare systems option.

Healthcare information systems of patients generate information that is processed consciously so that the individual can deliberate and make the best decisions. Individuals must guarantee that their data is collected, stored, or shared within their boundaries. Healthcare providers should ask their patients for permission to share the data with other healthcare service providers, and then the data will be used to coordinate care. The ethical problems highlighted by Greenberg et al. (2019) and Smith et al. (2020) effectively brought out the hardships of assimilating information systems in the healthcare industry. These studies may give rise to writing laws, ethics policies, and codes to curb the ethical dimension of using systems this way.

Evaluate the Legal Issues of Current Practices & Potential Changes

Legal issues in health information systems include professional liability, adherence to HIPAA policy, and information technology security (Austin et al., 2019; Edemekong et al., 2019). Potential changes involve training, HIPAA compliance, IT security guidelines, insurance company instructions, and regulatory considerations (Ahmad et al., 2021; Telehealth HHS.gov, 2022).

Because healthcare practices and delivery considerably change, regulations, and neutral legal surfaces must be up-to-date and compliant with all rules, healthcare information systems and coordinated care processes are often likely to raise specific legal questions, which states need to respond to soundly. Reducing our carbon footprint will demand strong efforts from all parts, individuals, and enterprises. Education, newer technologies, and policy-to-need orientations should be the significant achievable goals, with lifestyle changes and community collaborations as potential effects.

NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1

Data privacy and the applicable regulatory provisions are legally related concerns of such a technological advancement. Healthcare entities follow a highly structured regulatory system that allows for patient information protection – in turn, states like the US HIPAA mandates. All astute amendments to caring practices should be supervised laws for any unsettled penalties, including fines and court lawsuits. Interoperability and data sharing, however, though authorized by law, are at the same time yet in themselves an obstacle to legal progress. Compatibility of healthcare entity systems is of utmost significance, as failure of such efforts can eliminate data exchange feasibility and reliability. This makes patient security not a healthcare priority; hence, professionals have to deal with low patient security. The process of passing laws that would ensure data sharing along with interoperability agreements that do credit to the coordination process despite patients’ rights is necessitated.

Liability and accountability are considered relevant to presenting errors and coordinating healthcare omissions. Healthcare institutions are charged with an immense obligation to manage different legal systems as the judges often form the criteria that are passed for judgment. Harmonization of law systems, therefore, leads to reduced medical errors and adverse events. We require security in following coordination practices and also in the area of liability. Similarly, defining the protocols is essential for proceeding with the accountability process. As shown by the research (Halamka, 2019) and (Patel, 2020), these authors discuss the two significant legal barriers in healthcare delivery and care coordination. These studies focus on forming an integrated legal environment for all activities to overcome the possible adverse effects and regulate the processes.

NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 Current Outcomes Compared to Outcomes Seen with Best Practices

Best practices, such as team-based care and technology implementation, improve outcomes in blood pressure control, medication adherence, patient education, and care quality (McGilton et al., 2018; Houwelingen et al., 2021).

Sustaining desirable results in healthcare should imply formulating various long-term strategies for continued education and the impact of planned interventions on the right target as achieved eventually. Evidence-based approaches and strategies, such as creating an orientation towards individual responsibility, innovation, and a culture committed to matching improvements in the coordination and outcomes of patients, should be a priority to ensure the successful upkeep of the health system. On the contrary, a culture that produces care outcomes should not be the ultimate end but relatively continuous process improvement aimed at health care delivery. NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 application of such practice is shown by artistic planning throughout the collection of performance indicators, gaining necessary feedback from stakeholders, and improving the process based on data technology. The article by (Langley et al., 2019) and Murray, 2022) emphasize the importance of designing evaluation studies such as Lean, Six Sigma, and PDSA since these contribute to ensuring continuous excellence of care provision and healthcare process improvement.

Identifying Appropriate Evidence-Based Intervention

The Chronic Care Model (CCM) emphasizes evidence-based, team-based, patient-centered care (Yeoh et al., 2018). Health information technology (HIT) and medication management interventions, including reconciliation and adherence support, play vital roles (Sheikh et al., 2021; Margolis et al., 2022).

Role of Stakeholders & Interprofessional Teams

Stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals, staff, and educators, play crucial roles in identifying and rectifying issues (Peltonen et al., 2019). They should collaborate effectively and share evidence-based interventions for telehealth security issues (Groom et al., 2021).

NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 Use of Data-Driven Outcomes

Data-driven outcomes, based on analysis and interpretation, can assist healthcare professionals in monitoring and enhancing the quality of care (Borza et al., 2019). These outcomes help identify high-risk patients, enhance care coordination, and analyze program efficacy (Pilotto et al., 2018; Garcia et al., 2021; Margolis et al., 2022).

Ongoing Practices to Sustain Outcomes

Maintaining favorable results in healthcare requires ongoing monitoring, continuous quality improvement (CQI) procedures, patient and family engagement, and the use of health information technology systems (Smith & Mohamed, 2019; Sheikh et al., 2021; Garcia et al., 2021).

Conclusion

In NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 presentation concludes by highlighting the use of resources, interventions supported by research, stakeholder involvement, data analysis results, and the effectiveness of proposed interventions.

Thus, it proves that interdisciplinary work between health providers is a highly imperative step in that direction, along with learning and constantly searching for the newest treatments and methods. Induced by the sharing and communication terms among the health divisions, health organizations can benefit from using diverse expertise and information to identify and solve any health problems that may arise. According to the work of (Mitchell et al.,  2022), interdisciplinary teamwork was positively linked to enhancing patients’ care and coordinating coordination processes.

References

Ahmad, R. W., Salah, K., Jayaraman, R., Yaqoob, I., Ellahham, S., & Omar, M. (2021). The role of blockchain technology in telehealth and telemedicine. International Journal of Medical Informatics148, 104399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104399 

Austin, C., & Kusumoto, F. (2019). Updates in medical professional liability: A primer for electrophysiologists. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology: An International Journal of Arrhythmias and Pacing56(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0453-9 

Ceriello, A., Prattichizzo, F., Phillip, M., Hirsch, I. B., Mathieu, C., & Battelino, T. (2022). Glycaemic management in diabetes: Old and new approaches. The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology10(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00245-X 

Edemekong, P. F., Annamaraju, P., & Haydel, M. J. (2022). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. 

Garcia, A. P., Shelley Ann Francisco, & Mercado. (2021). Senior health information systems are available in Philippine government tertiary hospitals and health facilities.: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Research24(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/29541

Groom, L. L., McCarthy, M. M., Stimpfel, A. W., & Brody, A. A. (2021). Telemedicine and telehealth in nursing homes: An integrative review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association22(9), 1784–1801.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.02.037 

Legal considerations. Telehealth.HHS.gov. (2022). Retrieved December 22, 2022, from https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/legal-considerations/ 

Margolis, K. L., Anna R., Crain, A. L., J., Solberg, L. I., Beverly B., Haugen, P., Sharma, R., Rehrauer, McKinney, Z. J., Kottke, T. E., Rae Ann, & O’Connor. (2022). Contrasting in-person treatment. Hypertension79(12), 2708–2720. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19816

Marmor, R. A., Clay, B., Millen, M., Savides, T. J., & Longhurst, C. A. (2018). The impact of physician EHR usage on patient satisfaction. Applied Clinical Informatics9(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1620263 

Muthuppalaniappan, M., & Stevenson, K. (2021). Healthcare cyber-attacks and the COVID-19 pandemic: An urgent threat to global health. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care33(1), mzaa117. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa117 

Nittari, G., Khuman, R., Baldoni, S., Pallotta, G., Battineni, G., Sirignano, A., Amenta, F., & Ricci, G. (2020). Telemedicine practice: Review of the current ethical and legal challenges. Telemedicine Journal and e-health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association26(12), 1427–1437. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0158 

Peltonen, L. M., Nibber, R., Lewis, A., Block, L., Pruinelli, L., Topaz, M., Perezmitre, E. L., & Ronquillo, C. (2019). Emerging professionals’ observations of opportunities and challenges in nursing informatics. Nursing Leadership (Toronto, Ont.)32(2), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2019.25965 

Pilotto, A., Raffaella, & Petermans, J. (2018). Elderly technology. Aging47(6), 771–774. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy026

Sheikh, A., Anderson, M., Albala, S., B, Taylor, D., Tibble, & E. (2021). Digital innovation and health information technology. The Digital Health3(6), e383–e396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00005-4

Silva, T. N. D., Freire, M. E. M., Vasconcelos, M. F., Silva Junior, S. V. D., Silva, W. J. C., Araújo, P. D. S., & Eloy, A. V. A. (2018). Deontological aspects of the nursing profession: understanding the code of ethics. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem71(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0565 

Solimini, R., Busardò, F. P., Gibelli, F., Sirignano, A., & Ricci, G. (2021). Ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)57(12), 1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121314 

Van Houwelingen, T., Ettema, R. G. A., Bleijenberg, N., van Os-Medendorp, H., Kort, H. S. M., & Ten Cate, O. (2021). Educational intervention to increase nurses’ knowledge, self-efficacy and usage of telehealth: A multi-setting pretest-posttest study. Nurse Education in Practice51, 102924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102924

NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 Comparison of Current Outcomes with Best Practices

Comparing current outcomes versus outcomes highlighted with best practice delivery in healthcare is invaluable. It provides a clear picture of areas that need improvement. Assessing existing practices and comparing them with the best practices will help healthcare establishments locate nursing pitfalls, find ways to coordinate care, and improve results.

NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1 Evidence-Based Practice Making a wise decision about using the well-substantiated approach is of primary significance for improving care coordination and achieving health results in medical assistance. By putting into practice the interventions that have been supported through empirical evidence, healthcare organizations will flow a line of strategies that have been proven effective in addressing the specific challenges and reaching the desired outcomes as an example of an evidence-based measure that has proven successful in ensuring coordination of care through the use of systematized clinical record systems integrated with clinical decision support systems (EHR CDSS). The research found that EHRs and CDSS ease information navigation among healthcare professionals, and the care procedures are put in order, increasing the speed and quality of clinical decision-making. As per the perfect studies by (Bates et al., 2022) and (Kawamoto et al.,  2022), EHRs with CDSS carry immense potential to lessen medical errors, enhance drug management, and improve care coordination.

NURS FPX 6616 Assessment 1

Such CDSS integration with EHRs would ensure the patients’ instant access to their records, alert the department staff of any adverse incidents or possible drug interactions, and be an evidence-based medical practice guideline with the clinical practice guideline. EHR enables healthcare providers to access essential information immediately, improving coordinated care quality and reducing duplication of lab tests and procedures. Thus, patients’ safety has been enhanced. Literature by (Cresswell et al., 2023) and (Romano et al., 2021) titled ” The Role of EHRs and CDSS for improving care coordination and patient outcome.”. Both these studies strongly agree that EHRs and CDSS are evidence-based interventions that help know the status and progress of chronic patients at regular time intervals. Such studies also illustrate how technology-facilitated tools improve the care process, stemming health inequalities and promoting more patient-focused care delivery.