PCN 365 Topic 5 Family Systems Theory Case Study

You are currently viewing PCN 365 Topic 5 Family Systems Theory Case Study

Family Systems Theory Case Study

The focus of this paper will be a discussion of Family Systems Theory using the Bowen approach in “Ann’s Family” (Part One) and Minuchin’s approach in the “Quest Family” (Part Two) case studies (Sharf, 2014). The introductory pretensions of Bowen’s approach will be bandied. The primary thing of Ann’s family will be linked. A discussion of triangles and isolation of tone in regard to Ann’s family will be handed in. The introductory pretensions of Minuchin’s approach will be bandied. The primary thing of the Quest family will be linked. A discussion of spoken and implied rules of this family and an illustration of an alignment and a coalition from this case study will be handed in. Family systems remedy focuses on family member connections and sees the whole family as a unit or system with the treatment thing to understand and change the family structure (Sharf, 2014).

Bowen’s Approach

Bowen was interested in the impact of former generations on current family performance when it came to remedying pretensions. He headed to the presenting symptoms and, more importantly, family dynamics as they related to family member isolation and triangulation as he created pretensions in dealing with families (Brown, 2011). More specifically, he wanted to help families minimize their overall stress situations and develop ways to help family members separate themselves and meet their existent as well as family conditions( Kerr & Bowen, 1988). In the case of Ann’s family, Guerin, and Guerin (1976) state that the unqualified couple living in New York City have three espoused children, two boys and a girl.

PCN 365 Topic 5 Family Systems Theory Case Study

The son has been linked to the case, as the parents believed she was carrying erroneously. The major thing is to minimize overall stress and discover strategies to help family members come more discerned and meet their existent as well as family requirements (Sharf, 2014). The case study involves a triangulation between Ann, her mama (the children’s Grandmother), and Ann’s son. Ann believes that her mama is playing pets with the children and doesn’t suppose that this is fair to the other two children. It’s stated in the case study that Ann was the favorite among her siblings as a child.

Ann is floundering with isolation of tone. She’s seeing the way that she was favored by her mama and the issues that it caused between her and her siblings. Ann gets emotional about this and doesn’t want this same thing for her children. Rather than relying emotionally on her mama, Ann is prompted to consider the consequences of her connection with her mama and children. The issue of” playing pets with the three children” is examined, and the mama is prompted to question the triangles and suppose about removing herself from each of the children’s connections with her mama (Sharf, 2014).

PCN 365 Topic 5 Family Systems Theory Case Study

Minuchin’s Approach

The introductory pretensions of Minuchin’s approach are setting pretensions for change while working within the current structure of the family. Structural family therapists (SFT) aim to modify coalitions and alliances and establish healthy boundaries to bring about change in the family. SFTs also seek to help the family system in making effective use of power by aiding the maternal subsystem in its part as the family’s decision-making system. Family therapists use active and largely attentive family-performing strategies to bring about these changes. The Quest case study consists of a mama, Father, and four children. Jane, the mama, is 43 times old, and Paul, the Father, is 45. Jane is a stay-at-home mama to her four children, and Paul is a croaker of internal drugs.

Amy is 18, and her family, Ann, is 16 times old (Sharf, 2014). Paul and Jane had preliminarily taken Jason, 6, and Luke, 4, fostered the two boys, and latterly espoused them. Because of the boys’ disruptive guests, Paul and Jane are seeking a family remedy. The thing is to change the boys’ gests and to form a different type of connection (Bitter, 2014). This can be fulfilled by looking into the family structure and the family subsystems (Sharf, 2014). Positive remedial change can be achieved by assessing how the Quest family is organized, including its spoken and implied rules, as well as its subsystems, and correcting dangerous organizational patterns, similar to communication patterns that injure family members (Sharf). Rules within a family system can be spoken or implied and can be passed on from one generation to another.

PCN 365 Topic 5 Family Systems Theory Case Study

 In the case of the Quest family, the Mother was seen as the caretaker of the home and the children, including all of their extra-curricular conditioning. The Father was seen as the chuc-winner and had little to no commerce with the children or their outside interests. The Father sounded interested in involving himself more upon the therapist’s request, indeed though doubtful of how long it would last. Still, the Mother had her implied rule so hardwired that she couldn’t let go and allow her hubby to make any opinions as to what his involvement would look like (Sharf. 2014). There are several alignments and coalitions involved in the Quest case study.

The therapist forms an alliance with the Father in order to help the boys, and Paul form a stronger subsystem within the family. He encourages Paul to come more involved in the family. When the boys fight, the therapist suggests that Paul take care of them rather than Jane, and he backs Paul’s decision to change the boundaries. There’s a coalition between Paul and Jane. They both feel that they’re at a loss as to how to raise the boys, deal with their educational challenges, and change their disruptive guests (Sharf, 2014). Latterly on, the therapist brings in the Quest family daughters to speak about their Father’s part in the family, therefore observing the family subsystem of Paul, Amy, and Ann. Also, there’s alignment between the four children. The therapist instructs Ann and Amy to have a discussion with Jason and Luke to change the boundaries allowing helpful changes in the boy’s guests to take place (Sharf, 2014).


The family is viewed as a unit or a system in family systems remedy, and it must work together to serve well. One of the most abecedarian tenets of family systems remedy is that what happens to one family member affects the entire family. Murray Bowen’s intergenerational approach observes that parents’ connections with their own family of origin affect their relations with their children (Sharf, 2014). Salvador Minuchin’s structural system concentrates on the way that family members relate with one another during remedy and at home (Sharf, 2014).


Bitter,J.( 2014). proposition and practice of family remedy and comforting( 2nd ed.). Belmont CA Brooks/ Cole Cengage.

Brown,J.A.( 2011). Restless backers Taking Bowen’s proposition into a child-concentrated adolescent treatment unit in Australia. InO.C. Bregman &C.M. White( Eds.), Bringing systems allowing to life Expanding the midairs for Bowen family systems proposition(pp. 319 – 328).

New York Routledge/ Taylor & Francis. Guerin,P.J.,Jr., & Guerin,K.B.( 1976). Theoretical aspects and clinical applicability of the multi-generational model of family remedy. InP.J. Guerin, Jr.( Ed.), Family remedy proposition and practice(pp. 91 – 110). New York Gardner.

Kerr, M.E., & Bowen, M.( 1988). Family evaluation An approach grounded on Bowen’s proposition. New YorkW.W. Norton.

Sharf,R.S.( 2014). propositions of psychotherapy and comfort. Generalities and cases. In Cengage Learning( 6th ed.)