PSYCH 660 Week 1 Personal and Professional Ethics in Psychology

You are currently viewing PSYCH 660 Week 1 Personal and Professional Ethics in Psychology

Personal and Professional Ethics in Psychology: Understanding the Connection

Ethics is a crucial topic of discussion that psychologists, healthcare professionals, and colleagues also emphasize. It is recommended that healthcare professionals adhere to the standard of care outlined in the code of ethics in order to provide excellent, equitable, and equal care to their patients. It also helps the dynamic cycle during times when the response is easy to get. A conversation of the meaning of understanding one’s very own moral point of view will be remembered for this paper. An analysis of the connection between personal and professional ethics in psychology, a summary of my scores on the ethical awareness inventory, and a discussion of how the APA decision-making process facilitates ethical professional behavior.

Understanding Personal Ethical Perspective Personal ethics are standards or principles that are used every day, usually unnoticed. Individual qualities like an individual’s general person, ethics, and character impact a singular’s morals. A set in stone choice fills in as an establishment for moral direction. A moral commitment to make the best decision possible, whatever that means for the person making the choice. Only a small percentage of the population adheres to the same moral standards, and as a result, only a small percentage of the population will make the same decision, particularly when it comes to health-related issues. Individual morals and ethics continue to be intertwined. A person is one and the same throughout their development and is influenced by a variety of experiences.

PSYCH 660 Week 1 Personal and Professional Ethics in Psychology

The way of life the individual was raised in, the strict foundation and its significance to the individual, their personality cosmetics, and natural or familial encounters all have an impact on their moral perspective. Considering the different assortments of individual moral effects, one would reason that morals and moral perspectives are different for each individual. “A moral code ought to reflect the ethical standards fundamental the advantages of the calling,” as Fisher depicts it, (2013). Doing the right thing on an ethical level is the foundation of moral navigation. Despite the fact that only one odd person is strict, everyone naturally possesses an ethical compass.

Connection between Individual and Professional Morals in Brain Research Individual and professional morals share a few similarities. The dynamic cycle and individual morals are based on moral influences and are utilized in a person’s own life. They have an effect not only on the individual but also on the decisions that are made for them or their family.

The subsequent foundation of proficient morals and the dynamic cycle is based on moral decisions made in an expert environment. It has an impact on the mental health professional, patients, and collaborators whose choices it affects. Generally, considering the individual, these ethical perspectives will be a lot of something very similar. “Ethical behaviors are generally those that fulfill the fundamental moral obligations to do good, to do no harm, to respect others, and to treat all individuals honestly and fairly,” as stated by Fisher (2013), are the most prevalent types of ethical behavior in the majority of professions. This suggests that morals play an important role in making ethical choices, even in professional settings. 

PSYCH 660 Week 1 Personal and Professional Ethics in Psychology

However, the distinction between personal and professional ethics encompasses more than merely moral obligations. “An ethics code reflects a collective decision that a profession is better off when ethical standards are not based on individual assessments of what is or is not morally acceptable,” writes Fisher (2013). The professional setting is covered by this definition. Proficient moral principles and values can’t exclusively be founded on ethics according to the next point of view. It must be agreed upon by the profession from a variety of perspectives not only to gain public trust but also to protect the professional’s integrity while they carry out their responsibilities and provide patient care (Fisher, 2013). APA’s Moral Expert Way of Behaving and Dynamic Cycle the APA has made a few changes to the way the Set of Rules is written.

Optimistic and enforceable codes were recognized from the get go, which was believed to befuddle. As indicated by Fisher (2013), the optimistic code was comprised of “comprehensively phrased standards and standards” that predefined no specific expert ways of behaving that were correct or wrong. Instructive codes were utilized to join “moral standards with additional express understandings” to help experts in pursuing taught choices when moral choices were more mind boggling (Fisher, 2013). “a set of standards that specifically describe behaviors required and prescribed by the profession” were used by professionals to settle disputes, according to Fisher (2013). After seven updates, the eventual outcome was a blend of optimistic rules that included basic principles and enforceable guidelines for mental experts’ moral way of behaving (Fisher, 2013). The APA General set of rules’ vagueness prompted an undeniably wide understanding of its rules, which brought about lawful implications and unfriendly impacts on APA participations.

PSYCH 660 Week 1 Personal and Professional Ethics in Psychology

More adjustments were made “to support both the enforceability and legitimacy of APA moral principles, the 1992 Ethics Code tended to an outrageous change from its progenitors in both plan and content. “For the first time, clear distinctions were made between specific decision rules and aspirational principles that articulated foundational values of the discipline,” writes Fisher (2013). As a result, experts were required to adhere to additional specific moral principles, effectively excluding private translation.

My ethical profile is most aligned with obligation and least with equity, according to the Ethical Awareness Inventory results. At first, I wasn’t expecting the results because I didn’t think they were accurate. I’ll concede that I was off-base and that the examination is exceptionally near my moral point of view assuming you give me more subtleties. At first, I thought commitment meant that I was committed to making a moral decision based on my feelings about a particular situation or relationship. 

Then again, as per the EAI score, “you will quite often put together your moral point of view with respect to a singular’s obligation or commitment to do what is ethically correct – rules that address what sane people should ethically do.” According to Morals Mindfulness Stock (2012), “You accept that moral lead requests to ‘soul’.” I acknowledge that people naturally tend to make the best decision and focus less on the end goal and more on the reason for their actions.

PSYCH 660 Week 1 Personal and Professional Ethics in Psychology

In conclusion, this discussion of ethical perspectives reveals similarities and differences between professional and personal ethics. Our ethical childhood and different impacts impact our choices in specific circumstances. Individual morals are impacted by these impacts. In any case, ethically sound morals should also follow the APA’s rules and guidelines to assist experts in making moral decisions, even when they are not easily made. The Moral Mindfulness Stock can be utilized by organizations and even people to survey their moral style and how much ethics or the ability to act right impact their thinking skills.


Ethics Awareness Inventory. (2012). The Williams Institute for Ethics and Management. Retrieved from

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.