PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good, Bad, and Loving

You are currently viewing PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good, Bad, and Loving

Good, Bad, and Loving Every

human being has some social needs and requirements in order to try new things. Social psychology is the study of people’s interactions, relationships, and interactions with other people that should be ethical, respectful, cooperative, and fond (Mcleod, 2022). In any other case, it runs the risk of causing an emotional calamity and encouraging the personalities to become antisocial or engage in antisocial behaviors. Social interaction is necessary for living (Mcleod, 2022), so social psychologists offer a variety of explanations and justifications for distinguishing between the two.

Social acceptance varies depending on personality type; notwithstanding, it is important to comprehend which social collaboration is compelling for our mental well-being and how it ought to be catered to effectively. It is necessary to resolve a situation through effective and ethical confrontation without disrespecting the feelings or emotions of others because many life events can cause others to misunderstand your actions (Mcleod, 2022).

We will continue to examine Susan’s ups and downs, particularly in relation to social acceptance, in this evaluation. For this reason, the academic sources will be applied with powerful hypotheses to assist with creating understanding.

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good, Bad, and Loving

Sum up the Contextual analysis

Susan proceeds with her examinations in school and gives herself a quiet climate to steadily climb every step. She accepts Mark’s invitation to a party hosted by him and his friend Joe, whom she frequently sees in that coffee shop because she has not yet taken a break from her studies. She gets eager to get social communication and live it up, and when she shows up at the party, Imprint acquaints her with Joe and his date, and everybody gets drawn in by major areas of strength for her. She before long acclimated to the party yet detected that Imprint was taking her friendship wrongly.

When Mark and Joe talk about her, she finds out that Mark values her more than just her friendliness because she lets him hold her hand and talks sweetly. However, to clear up the misunderstanding, she accepted Mark’s Facebook friend request and called herself a taxi at the party’s conclusion to express her gratitude for his kindness and her enjoyment of the evening. She believed that by doing so, she would convey to him that she was not interested in him but admired her as a friend because they had just met for the first time.

However, after a few days, Susan confronted Mark for misinterpreting her friendly nature when she received notifications on her Facebook account where Mark had posted love stories about her confirming her relationship status. She thought she had to clear up their misunderstanding. However, she must be truthful with others, particularly regarding her feelings, even though it will be painful for Mark. Mark makes his love public, requiring her to write a delicate message in which she can affectionately reject the relationship status. Despite having a good time and enjoying the party, she was confident in her actions because they had only met once; that impression misconstrued Imprint, so she deferentially put down clear stopping points in that answer and unfriended him by showing her assurance. Thus, social brain research hypotheses will be utilized, and lonely love best fits this situation.

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good, Bad, and Loving

M. Clark et al.’s Credible and Scholarly Sources for a Specific Theory 2019) talked about unrequited love, which is a one-sided love in which the other person doesn’t talk about or accept their feelings. Most of the time, people do it in secret and are afraid of being rejected, so they avoid showing their love to that person (M. Clark et al., 2019). The motivation to remain friends with the rejecter, according to this study, may assist in maintaining the relationship. However, people experience distress as rejection lowers morale and makes them feel vulnerable in front of that person because they believe they have failed as a pursuer (M. Clark et al., 2019). However, this research indicates that the motivation to be the rejecter’s friend is to alleviate the person’s distress and maintain stable mental health while they have the opportunity to rekindle their friendship (M. Clark et al., 2019).

On the other hand, Dwyer (2020) looked into the scientific treatment for heartbreak and unrequited love because one-sided affection can have a significant impact on a person’s mental and physical health, so its treatment should be done ethically and carefully (Dwyer, 2020). People who are loved first are typically negatively impacted by unrequited love, and if any of them confess their love to that person and are rejected, it may break their hearts. A wrecked heart can cause many effects, like chest snugness and windedness (Dwyer, 2020).

However, determining the degree of unrequited love’s severity in relation to time is crucial. The more extended the preferring can cause significant tragedy, however assuming it was the fascination and creating affection for that specific individual for a brief timeframe, then it probably won’t have major or extreme side effects like chest torment (Dwyer, 2020). However, distress, rage, and behavioral issues such as the ego’s reaction to being rejected can also have a negative impact on mental and physical health (Dwyer, 2020).

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good, Bad, and Loving

Social psychological research studies are related to a specific social psychological theory Psychological behaviors have a significant impact on people’s lives; as a result, psychologists conduct research and develop theories that help people effectively understand the behavior (Baumeister & Bushman, 2020). Because theories and models provide frameworks for appropriately addressing specific situations, psychologists included theories in the research studies to make the process simpler and more convenient (Baumeister & Bushman, 2020). Social mental investigates empower clinicians and other individual people to find out about ways of behaving, perspectives, and social collaboration abilities with others in light of the fact that, as a human, we require commitment and connections to keep up with our social way of life. According to Baumeister & Bushman (2020), psychologists and researchers aligned the research with theories in which each perception and idea is based on a specific attitude and behavior.

The researchers are able to predict and investigate the relationships between variables with the assistance of theories. Most likely, all of the incidents are connected to ideas and thinking; However, according to Baumeister & Bushman (2020), they could be loving, bad, or good. In a similar vein, Susan was confronted by Mark’s emotional transition, which forced her to acknowledge her feelings by clearly and respectfully dismissing his misinterpretation in his Facebook post.

Apply a Social Psychological Theory to the Picked Case Study

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good, Bad, and Loving

According to this case study, Mark was the victim of unrequited love because Susan did not grow up feeling the same way Mark did. Susan acknowledged the greeting in light of her chaotic daily practice, and she needed to have a great time at night with individuals, yet Imprint misjudged her neighborliness for adoration, and he thought she was into him, so she didn’t deny his greeting. Susan partook in the party and permitted Imprint to get free with her, which offered him some unacceptable hints; However, as soon as she realized this, she booked a cab for herself and thanked him for the fantastic night of fun. She was under the impression that doing so would convey to Mark that she had only accepted the invitation to meet new people and have a fun night. However, after a few days, she noticed that Mark had approached her in public and made it clear that he was in a relationship with her. Because they only officially met once, Mark’s action makes Susan straightforward and lenient, not to disrespect Mark’s feelings but to reject his love. She wrote the post-post text to publicly reject his love, which makes reference to the unrequited love theory for Mark.

For instance, pathetic love characterizes really liking someone else as a result of little communication or their alluring character and getting dismissed by them because of not having a similar inclination for the individual who loves (Lawrenz and I. Lebow, 2022). Susan doesn’t feel equivalent to Check after just a single gathering, while Imprint creates heartfelt affection for her due to her accommodating nature.

Apply a Moral Thinking Idea to a Picked Contextual Investigation

In Susan’s situation, we can execute the Ethical Mindfulness moral idea. Susan was totally mindful of her affection for Imprint, while Imprint got some unacceptable signs in view of Susan’s appealing character and agreeable nature. Susan acted ethically when she saw Mark’s Facebook posts and decided to reject him to prevent Mark’s feelings and emotions from being disturbed and causing him distress. This was a good ethical response from Susan. She was a little hesitant and perplexed, but Mark’s public declaration of his love for her forced her to give that response. Mark’s method of announcing his love for her was completely wrong because he didn’t ask her permission before announcing their relationship. As he invited her (the host of the party), Susan allowed him to become friendly, sending him the wrong signals. Moral awareness, on the other hand, is the behavioral ethical concept that could be most applicable to this circumstance. In this concept, Susan is aware of her moral boundaries and how to carry them out in social situations (Gheaus, 2021).

(Gheaus, 2021) Behavioral ethics is the study of decisions that people make that either are ethical or are not ethical. In this case, Mark’s decision was not ethical, but Susan handled the situation well. Her ethical mindfulness made her more cautious and quiet while answering Imprint’s admission freely, as she would have rather not hurt his sentiments despite the fact that he crossed the restriction of conduct morals.

Apply a Decisive Reasoning Idea to a Picked Contextual investigation

Social brain science empowers decisive reasoning since it propels scientists, perusers, analyzers, and analysts to basically dissect what is going on and present their contemplations. According to The British Psychological Society (2002), distinct personalities may hold divergent opinions regarding particular criteria that reflect their nature and way of thinking. There are two kinds of critical thinking: Faith in reason (which places a strong value on one’s own abilities) and fairness (which considers the opinions of others to be valid) According to Brown (2018), “fair-mindedness” is defined as “awareness and respect for every person’s views” and “treat all perspectives accurately without interfering with your interests.” “confidence in reason” refers to having confidence in your perspective that your interest is superior among all concepts and the habitual tendency to make a decision based on your ability.”

PSYC FPX 3520 Assessment 4 Good, Bad, and Loving

In a similar vein, the Susan case study made reference to a few conclusions and findings. Susan decided to correct Mark without interfering with moral or ethical concepts because she saw Mark as her possession. Be that as it may, in the event that we glance through Imprint’s side, he was somewhat kind to her because of her solid character and lovely attributes, in addition to her acknowledging his greeting firsthand, making him think she likewise felt something similar. Moreover, at the party, Susan doesn’t stay away from or keep him from being agreeable with her, which gives him wrong thoughts, and his affection creates. However, she acted ethically at the party’s conclusion by booking a cab for herself, which made him sad and led him to attempt unethical actions. However, if we look at the whole situation, Mark’s friend Joe also played a significant role in shaping his perspective on Susan, which leads him in the wrong direction. We, on the other hand, took a fair-minded approach by considering both sides and points of view because Susan behaved like a good friend and nothing else while encouraging Mark’s views Joe made him fall in love with her (Brown, 2018).

In a nutshell, Susan accepts Mark’s invitation to his house party because she wants to socialize and hang out despite her hectic study schedule. Susan has a great time at the party and acts like a good friend to Mark, giving him the wrong impression and making him fall in love with her. Nonetheless, as this was their most memorable communication, Susan didn’t get appended and left him toward the finish of the party, which made Imprint grief stricken here; We utilized social psychology’s unrequited love theory. Susan, on the other hand, maintained her composure and fully comprehended Mark’s circumstance; as a result, she developed a soft spot for Mark and made the ethical decision to publicly reject him. She successfully establishes boundaries and does not offend Mark’s love for her because of her moral awareness. Since the stories of both sides were altered by their unique perspectives, fairness is the most appropriate strategy in this situation.


Baumeister, R. F., & Bushman, B. J. (2020). Social Psychology and Human Nature. In Google Books. Cengage Learning.

Brown, E. J. (2018, March 18). Fair-Minded critical thinking in development education: Reflections on Pedagogies for transformation. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning6(1), 21.

Dwyer, B. (2020). The Need for a Scientific Cure for Feelings of Heartbreak and Unrequited Love. Retrieved March 14, 2023, from

Gheaus, A. (2021, April 21). Unrequited love, self-victimization, and the target of appropriate resentment. The Journal of Ethics24, 487–499.

Lawrenz, L., & I. Lebow, H. (2022, June 20). Unrequited love: Meaning, signs, and tips to overcome it. Psych Central.

Clark, E., L. B. Votaw, K., L. B. Votaw, A. x, Hasan, M., & Fernandez, P. (2019, July 30). Unrequited love: The role of a prior commitment, motivation to remain friends, and friendship maintenance. The Journal of Social Psychology120(3), 293–309. Taylor & Francis Online.

Mcleod, S. (2022). Social Psychology: Definition, Theories, Principles, & Examples. Simply Psychology – Study Guides for Psychology Students.Retrieved March 14, 2023, from

The British Psychological Society. (2022, September 16). Why is critical thinking important for Psychology students? – The British Psychological Society.